« I dislike racists and I dislike niggers even more | The never ending list of new bans in Islamic finance »


May 20, 2007

Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum Foundation

You won’t see me taking my hat off for Arab leaders often, but one has to render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's. Sheikh Al-Maktoum’s initiative of creating a sizeable educational fund is an excellent one. Though there are chances this will just be another isolated initiative, one’s wishful thinking would lead to hoping for more investment into education and research throughout the region.

“The most alarming indicators are the 18% illiteracy in the under-15 age group and the 43% illiteracy among females in the region.

(…) According to human development reports, literary and intellectual books published in the Arab world represent only 0.08% of the world’s output, less than those published in Turkey alone. For every 100,000 books published in North America, there are 42,000 published in South America, and only 6,500 books published in the Arab world.
In terms of spending on scientific research, His Highness said the Arab world spends only 0.02% of its GDP while developed countries spend between 2.5% and 5%. In the Arab world, for every 10,000 people in the workforce there are 3.3 academic scholars, while the developed world has 110 for every 10,000.

This by itself sums up why the Arab World isn’t taking off. If the region is to catch up, it needs to invest not as much but even more than developed countries on education.

15 million jobs are needed right now in the Arab world, and 74 million to 85 million new jobs will be needed over the next 20 years. He said that the business environment in the Arab world would need to be improved if these jobs were to be created, but there are challenges that will need to be overcome. “On average, Arab countries ranked 107 out of 175 in terms of the amount of red tape involved in setting up a business”

This is also fundamental but would probably be more difficult to change than education. The interests of the ruling elites themselves are at stake if reforms are to be undertaken. The first step would be to demonstrate the benefits those elites would derive from reforms. I don’t see this being done right now.

Posted by Shaheen at May 20, 2007 02:11 PM
Filed Under: MENA Region General

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.aqoul.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/3336


Comments

Shaheen is just a shill for Big Literacy.

Posted by: matthew hogan at May 20, 2007 07:40 PM

Ya Shaheen,

yet again, if this only focuses on technical expertise - like all those Western universities in the MidEast that have sprung up over the past years - then it won't do much good.

One of the main flaws of the last decades of development politics has been to try to "use the good & avoid the evil of the West" because it translated into "we want technical education but not social sciences and humanities".

Let's see how those Sorbonne-on-the-Gulf experiments pan out.

--MSK*

Posted by: MSK at May 21, 2007 11:26 AM

MSK,

you have a good point, but. If the MENA region produced 100,000 engineers every year, the rest would follow naturally, so I wouldn't worry much about it. India for example produces a 100,000 just in IT. I don't remember the exact number, but a few years ago, I saw a stat for MENA and it was more along the few thousands a year.

Matthew, am I missing some pun?

Posted by: Shaheen [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 21, 2007 12:02 PM

No pun; just a parody of the habitual lefty jibe that is made at people who say nice things about big institutions. (Shill for Big Tobacco, Big oil, etc.)

Posted by: matthew hogan at May 21, 2007 12:33 PM

regarding India and engineers.

Key quote: In the United States, by some estimates fully 40 percent of Indian-Americans hail from Gujarat, where a large proportion belong to the Swaminarayan sect of Hinduism, distinctive for its emphasis on uncritical obedience to the utterances of the current leader of the sect, whose title is Pramukh Swami Maharaj. On a visit to the elaborate multimillion-dollar Swaminarayan temple in Bartlett, Ill., I was given a tour by a young man recently arrived from Gujarat, who delighted in telling me the simplistic Hindu-right story of India's history, and who emphatically told me that whenever Pramukh Swami speaks, one is to regard it as the direct voice of God and obey without question. At that point, with a beatific smile, the young man pointed up to the elaborate marble ceiling and asked, "Do you know why this ceiling glows the way it does?" I said I didn't, and I confidently expected an explanation invoking the spiritual powers of Pramukh Swami. My guide smiled even more broadly. "Fiber-optic cables," he told me. "We are the first ones to put this technology into a temple." There you see what can easily wreck democracy: a combination of technological sophistication with utter docility. I fear that many democracies around the world, including our own, are going down that road, through a lack of emphasis on the humanities and arts and an unbalanced emphasis on profitable skills.

I don't know if I agree, but that might be my background. Far too much emphasis on humanities here in Denmark, with highly educated unemployment following.

Posted by: Klaus [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 21, 2007 04:38 PM

Most American Gujaratis I've encountered have been Ismaili Muslims.

They rigidly obey Rita Hayworth.

Posted by: matthew hogan at May 21, 2007 05:59 PM

I don't think that most Indian Engineers are Gujaratis .
They are more likely to be traders and merchants whether that be in Africa or in the UK or as Diamond merchants in the Netherlands.A number of motels across America are owned by Gujarati Patels.

Posted by: history_lover at May 21, 2007 11:57 PM

Most of the Indian engineers you're likely to meet in the States are South Indian, at least the first-gens; Gujaratis are historically more likely to be traders and entrepreneurs (again, the ones that make it overseas).

I agree with MSK that the full benefits of Western education cannot be felt with just technical or scientific or business schools, if you want to get people to think creatively you need to focus more on primary and secondary level pedagogy, and of course, the social sciences and humanities are important as well in producing economists and urban planners and political reformers and civil society groups and artists and writers, all of whom will be very necessary indeed if Dubai is not to turn into a sheikhly-technocratic city that no-one wants to live in long-term because there's nothing to do except shop and work.

Posted by: SP at May 22, 2007 02:17 AM

SP:
Dubai's government is very happy for most Indians (and other expats) to go back. Indeed, most of them leave when they retire retire, not least because their extended families are not in Dubai. They often use the money they save in the Gulf to build homes in their country of origin.

Economists and urban planners can be imported. Gulf governments are not as keen on bringing in political reformers and most civil society groups for reasons I don't need to explain here.

Posted by: dubaiwalla [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 23, 2007 10:05 AM

Dear Sirs ,
I am Ehsan Jaber Mehdy Alkhafagy, Iraqi national. I am living and working in the Republic of Yemen since 1991 up until now. I am 42 years old. I am a teacher of English, but now I enjoy The International Protection through the UNHCR ( Sana'a office) File No: 677-05C06808 which valied on next August.
I am writing to offer and discuss my proposals with you.I have some innovation project ideas of my own in the hope that they would study and maybe be adopt them as letters of patent or send me an invitation to discuss the matter with you.I offer you my proposals concerning my my ideas of innovations.I herewith writing them enclose to my message , hoping you kindly consider and tell me your opinion about them.
In case you are interested and want more detailed information on nuture and practicability of my ideas, please respond to my postal mail address or to my E-Mail address and I will be glad and willing to give you as much as possible information you will ask for and the idea of their design.
Ideas on some innovations I studied and designed with details for implementation on certain important applications with regard to Environment protection, Generation of Energy from sources I believe have not attempted before and Airlines Safety.I have been working on those projects for the last couple of years.
1. Environment Protection.
a. Disposal of Garbage.
b. Getting Rid of Garbage and Dumps.
c. Fighting and Extinguishing Forest Fires and Erupting in oil Fields ,and prevent their spread to large areas.
d. Preventing and Stopping Over Flooding of the Rivers.
2. New Sources of Energy.
a. Pressure- driven Turbines for Generating Power.( two ways ).
b. Train Turbines.
c. Sand Turbines.
d. Used Tyres Turbines.
3. Improving Function of Electric Apparatuses and Equipment.
4. Design of a ( V I P 's) car.
5. Design of ant - thief cars ( not alarm ).
6. Airlines Safety.
a. Preventing Airplanes from Crashing into the ground.
b. Preventing The Terrorists attacks ( air bombing ,Hijacking .....etc )
I am looking forward to receiving your kind response soon. Thank you .
Yours Sincerely
Ehsan Al Khafagy
P.O Box 11320
Sanaa,
Republic of Yemen

Posted by: Ehsan Jaber Mehdy Alkhafagy at May 28, 2007 01:06 PM

BTW, the comment above is irrelevant yet intriguing, so I've unjunked it.

Posted by: eerie [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 29, 2007 08:31 PM

(1) The earth belongs equally to us all, and (2)what we produce belongs to us only and is our private property. There is a tax system based on these principles and not surprisingly, it can create prosperity anywhere while fully supporting the government. It has already done so wherever it has been tried.

Fortunately, there are literally hundreds of empirical studies fully enacting and supporting these principles which I would be happy to send to anyone requesting them. - 10528 Cross Fox Lane, Columbia MD 21044, U.S.A.

Posted by: Stevencord at June 6, 2007 10:25 AM

(1) The earth belongs equally to us all, and (2)what we produce belongs to us only and is our private property. There is a tax system based on these principles and not surprisingly, it can create prosperity anywhere while fully supporting the government. It has already done so wherever it has been tried.

Fortunately, there are literally hundreds of empirical studies fully enacting and supporting these principles which I would be happy to send to anyone requesting them. - 10528 Cross Fox Lane, Columbia MD 21044, U.S.A.

Posted by: Stevencord at June 6, 2007 10:25 AM

Comment Subscription

Email Address: