« Rock the Casbah bis: Casablanca Bombings | Egalité in time of elections »
March 19, 2007
Encore Rock the Casbah: Casablanca Terror & Mohammed al Faiz - A Proposal on Aid
I should start by admitting that that when our Permanent Anon inquired about Mohammed Faiz, I had a somewhat (or even rather) dismissive reaction. A dismissive reaction that was utterly wrong and misplaced. Faiz for those who don't know, is the supervisor and by family, owner, of an internet cafe in a poor neighbourhood in the Moroccan city of Casablanca who stopped an attempted bombing there.
My original reaction was, effectively, yeah, he did a good deed and possibly for his own interest (e.g. frightened he might get in trouble), so what?
On reflexion and on review of international and domestic press that effectively highlight the recidivist takfiri suicide bomber Raydi, I have changed my mind. And indeed apologize for my superficial reaction.
Leave aside, then, that Faiz probably is either by nature utterly apolitical or even Islamist in political leaning. He clearly reacted against, by all published accounts (and we should take into account potential exaggerations etc) relying on eye-witnesses, signs of a repeat of the 2003 bombings. At risk of his own life, and even risking that of his clients, and even more so his family’s livelihood. All accounts indicate he reacted due to the strange and threatening behaviour of Raydi and his companion, accounts seeming unanimous on this account, locking them in the Café and calling the police.
Given the Moroccan authorities report – and there seems no reason to doubt the general figure – finding afterwards 350 kg of explosives in a bomb factory in an apartment associated with the would-be bombers, Faiz spared Morocco a repeat of the 2003 bombings, and who knows how many Moroccan and foreigners lives.
Anon suggested that a Mohammed Faiz Fund be established. I think the suggestion not only useful but appropriate. Faiz, his family, and several of his clients suffered severe losses, and some are maimed for life. Certainly, one has to admit that in Iraq worse passes every day, but Iraq is a civil war which not even the full resources of the world’s greatest power can stabilize. However, in the case of Faiz, rather human efforts, individual efforts may be able to compensate him, his family and the victims, and further indicate that to some extent the outside world cares, beyond oil and national interest.
I would suggest, in this small way, a real difference could be made.
My preliminary proposal then is the following:
- A fund be established on a non-partisan basis and without any point of view on Islam, political movements or other issues, other than in support of compensating the principal, Mohammed Faiz and his act against the blind violence of terror bombings.
- A subsidiary role of the Fund, by clearly established standards, might aim to compensate the other victims of the violence of 11 March 2007 in terms of medical and related expenses related to direct losses.
- A final potential proposition would be, if sufficient funds were donated and in excess of reasonable requirements to cover points one and two, to support new entrepreneurial developments by the victims of 11 March 2007.
- The Fund should be managed by a cost effective international and local trustee, and be capable of accepting at minimum international donations, as well as ideally local donations on an equal basis if possible.
- Said Fund should be self terminating with an aim to disburse all aide in a reasonable time frame and with the sole objective of collecting and disbursing non-denominational and non-political donations with the expectation of all donations contributing to the goals cited supra.
- Donations should be anonymous.
- All sums donated should be placed in a secure, transparent account and any excess after meeting the defined criteria, if any, donated to a defined and reputable international charity such as the Red Cross / Red Crescent for domestic Moroccan application.
Thoughts, feed back and the like are welcome. I would intend that Aqoul be a clearing house for organising a proper legal vehicle, however Aqoul should not be the driver.
For those who are interested, you may email us. Further interest should be directed to our account, and to the extent drawing outside interest is useful, feel free.
The Lounsbury
Posted by The Lounsbury at March 19, 2007 06:56 PM
Filed Under: North Africa
, Op-Ed
, Terrorism
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.aqoul.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/3271
Comments
A fund be established on a non-partisan basis and without any point of view on Islam, political movements or other issues, other than in support of compensating the principal, Mohammed Faiz and his act against the blind violence of terror bombings.
Excellent. Of course, the fund will be taking the position that suicide bombings are evil which is quite a strong political point of view in some quarters. But that's kind of the point.
A subsidiary role of the Fund, by clearly established standards, might aim to compensate the other victims of the violence of 11 March 2007 in terms of medical and related expenses related to direct losses.
Probably OK, but as you say, you need clear standards and clear priorities. For example, 1)Faiz's actual, unreimbursed medical expenses, then (2)everybody else's (apart from the other suicide bomber!) actual, unreimbursed medical expenses, then (3)some maximum, fixed, quite generous amount to compensate Faiz for the damage to his business and for lost income. Then (4) much smaller amounts to compensate the other innocent injured people for their lost incomes.
A final potential proposition would be, if sufficient funds were donated and in excess of reasonable requirements to cover points one and two, to support new entrepreneurial developments by the victims of 11 March 2007.
Too complicated. I'd scratch this. For one thing, it'd be hard to get trustee to administer this as it requires much more subjective and tedious decision making, though I'm sure you'd be happy to advise!
The Fund should be managed by a cost effective international and local trustee, and be capable of accepting at minimum international donations, as well as ideally local donations on an equal basis if possible.
Yes, definitely, some Casablancan Scandinavian consulate would be ideal. Ok, maybe not the Danish consulate, but anybody else would be fine.
What do you mean by "accepting international and local funds on an equal basis?"
Said Fund should be self terminating with an aim to disburse all aide in a reasonable time frame
Definitely.
Donations should be anonymous.
You can, and should, instruct the trustee not to reveal the names of donors but I don't believe truly anonymous international donations will be possible. It is impossible, at least from Europe/North America, to wire money to Morocco anonymously. At least not legally . . .
All sums donated should be placed in a secure, transparent account and any excess after meeting the defined criteria, if any, donated to a defined and reputable international charity such as the Red Cross / Red Crescent for domestic Moroccan application.
Definitely.
As you're the guy closest to the action, I'd leave it to your discretion to set the compensation levels and find a trustee.
Trustee, is, in fact, the wrong word. One doesn't need to set up a discrete legal entity like a formal trust. It's just an earmarked account somewhere. A fund like this is really just an escrow account.
Posted by: Anonymous at March 19, 2007 10:26 PM
I'm with anon on point 3. Possibly designate an NGO doing local development/microfinance/entrepreneurship training or whatever satisfies you as not a complete waste of time, should funds remain beyond compensation for the various victims.
Posted by: Tom Scudder at March 20, 2007 01:20 PM
I await input from Moroccan locals on this, as under no circumstances is I going to get closely involved in such things, beyond facilitation and donation.
Posted by: The Lounsbury at March 20, 2007 03:02 PM

RSS





