« Language rivalries in the Maghreb | "From Iraqi society to societies in Iraq" - Some further thoughts »
January 23, 2007
Female Saudi student vs. FrontPageMag jihadist
I would've never thought that I'd ever call my readers' attention toward a piece in FrontPageMag, but hey, if The Eagles can make hell freeze over ...
The interview is from Feb '06 but I don't think it has lost any value. I found it particularly interesting how Moudhy al-Rashid did not let herself be baited by the interviewer's harping on the usual tropes. Certainly her own positions are worthy of debate and she herself stated that she doesn't see them as finalized, but she is certainly representative of a broader group of young women in KSA (and other MENA countries).
Some quotes:
The position of people living under a Soviet regime, or in communist Russia, is quite different from the position of those living in a traditionalist Islamic state. I am not defending tyranny. I am defending the historical agency, specific to women in Saudi Arabia, that the Western media denies us by portraying us as victims and victims only. The young girls who died in the fire in 2002 were indeed victims, and they will never be forgotten. However, to claim that those fifteen girls represent all women in Saudi Arabia and women in majority Muslim societies everywhere is incorrect, not to mention that it is sick to turn an incident that claimed the lives of fifteen innocent girls into a literary trope or a means of lumping the experiences of women in a vast majority of cultural and political milieus into a homogenized, oppressed group.
[...]
To insist on relying on the more extreme examples of oppression, such as stonings and other isolated incidents that work their way into the Western media, in order to frame the debate will only perpetuate the very misconceptions that have created such a misunderstanding between East and West--a misunderstanding that generates hatred and discrimination that in turn makes freedom more and more impossible for Middle Eastern women to attain. How can women's movements in Saudi Arabia move forward if "freedom fighters" will not take their claims seriously, if "freedom fighters" will reduce their rights to those of sexual self-determination which many women are not interested in, and if "freedom fighters" are not willing to address the real issues instead of the ones propagandized in the media. It is true, as Fatima Mernissi argues, that questions about freedom and modernity turn on women, but the woman question should not be reduced to a question of sex. This reinforces the very objectification that we (and by we, I mean all women all over the world) must confront in its various forms.
[...]
Whether or not you choose to believe it, women are making strides even within the framework of the Saudi regime. Pakistan and Saudi Arabia are two different countries each of which applies a different corpus of Shari'a, which is not an edifice of unchanging, homogenous microcosmic law. A study of "Islamic-Arab" law and society does not amount to a study of Saudi law and society. Perhaps, you might read a more systematic study of Saudi law, which can be found for example in the works of Frank E. Vogel, the director of the Islamic legal studies program at Harvard, before you equate the legal framework and legal system of that country to those of other "Islamic-Arab" countries.
[...]
To read about her discussion of the prohibition of driving for women in KSA, the veil, etc.pp. I suggest you click on those two links:
(The links will convey you to the print-formatted version - that way you won't be bothered by FPM's ads.)
Posted by MSK at January 23, 2007 11:34 PM
Filed Under: Gender Issues
, Gulf
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.aqoul.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/3197
Comments
Good stuff. The Saudi woman is sharp, and remarkably articulate for a student, and makes some good points (e.g. the sexual self-determination vs general freedom one, and much of what she said on the second page). I found the Foucauldian posturing a bit annoying though, and unfortunately in her efforts to counter the idiot interviewer's prejudices she came across as rather defensive.
Posted by: SP at January 24, 2007 11:24 AM
Having been on the other side of a front page mag interview (although he mostly agreed with me and others -- not on a Mideast issue, btw), Jamie Glazov came across as someone who liked to opine aggressively but who also let you have your full say, and sincerely encouraged disagreement.
Posted by: matthew hogan at January 24, 2007 02:37 PM
Dear SP,
well, at the time of the interview (almost one year ago), Moudhy al-Rashid was a senior at Columbia U, and hardly a seasoned media veteran.
I posted the interview because I think it's very informative & one doesn't get to read young Saudi (female or male) voices all too often on such a high level.
Dear MH,
Jamie Glazov came across as someone who didn't for a second consider her point of view. He played the part of "I'm the son of Soviet dissidents" and not much more.
At times I wondered what the whole point of the interview was.
--MSK
Posted by: MSK at January 24, 2007 03:00 PM
Oh, I thought she did a fantastic job of handling the interviewer. The I-just-discovered-Foucault jargon was what grated a little bit.
Posted by: SP at January 25, 2007 07:43 AM
I don't expect much from FrontPage - they choose the most provocative MENA 'specialists' they can, and then don't allow whatever poor respondent from the region (often, ridiculously conciliatory, such as Schwartz or others) - but just like above with Mouhdy, whenever they don't agree with the racist and offensive absolutist ranting, they accuse them of defending "totalitarian Islamist... reactionaries" - really, neo-conservativism resembles Bolshie and Trotskyite tactics so much that it's no surprise to find out that many of them were Trots when they were younger.
I loathed the infighting and moronic behaviour on the left, I'm appalled now by the same people who've migrated over and taken on the bigotry and outright vitriol of the right as well.
Posted by: dawud at January 25, 2007 08:57 AM
Nice to see something that isnt the usual media tripe regarding Saudi women. I had hoped that we might see something better with the Rania al Baz affair, but her appearance on Oprah dashed that.
Hopefully we see more of this type of stuff. Saudi women are out there and their voice will be heard.
Once thing I have noticed is the lack of voices from older Saudi women, both in the media and on-line.
My wife started her blog. She is a thirty something Saudi woman, married with children. Most of the Saudi pressence on the net seems to be the teens or early twenties.
That is not to put down bloggers like Farah whom I think is just great, but the "bloggersphere" and the rest of the internet could benefit from older voices as well. Aya over at Alien Spheres is another good one in this direction.
Posted by: Abu Sinan at January 25, 2007 09:01 AM
While the interviewer starts to sound like he is frothing at the mouth over Saudi women and their sexulality (I can just visualise the rows of burqa porn in his video collection) the fact of the matter is that the entire culture of segregation in pre-Islamic and Islamic Saudi society derives largely from the fear of human sexuality and the desire to regulate and control it.
So while the line of questioning was badly done, the issue of sexual self-determination is one of the most relevant ones facing Saudi women today. Because it is at the root of why the segregation and the oppression exist. It's why she can't drive and why she can't travel and why thousands of ardent young muslims agonise over the haramness of communicating with their own fiancee before marriage or even meeting her parents and even the haramness of blogging/the internet if it might bring them into contact with a member of the opposite sex.
Getting a dozen PhDs won't help a woman's brain replace her sexuality as her primary determining aspect in the mindset of Saudi lawmakers and wider Gulf society.
Posted by: secretdubai
at January 25, 2007 06:10 PM
"Getting a dozen PhDs won't help a woman's brain replace her sexuality as her primary determining aspect in the mindset of Saudi lawmakers and wider Gulf society."
I'm not sure decades of suffrage and feminism and PhDs, MD's, and IUDs have depleted that 100% on this side of the Atlantic pond either.
Posted by: matthew hogan at January 25, 2007 06:29 PM
I'm not sure decades of suffrage and feminism and PhDs, MD's, and IUDs have depleted that 100% on this side of the Atlantic pond either.
Sadly very true. However even Victorian women weren't prohibited from driving carriages (to the best of my knowledge) even if they did probably ride side-saddle.
Posted by: secretdubai
at January 26, 2007 09:48 AM
I have always laughed a bit about the driving issue. They wont allow women to drive as they might get up to no good. Yet I have had a dozen or so stories related to me by Saudis themselves of the wife/sister/cousin/aunt getting caught having an affair with the Sudanese/Pakistani/Indian/Bengali driver.
I guess the assumption is that whilst Saudi women should not be with males they are unrelated to that they would not consider messing around with the foreign (thought inferior) driver.
It says a lot about the view of sexuality and their view of foreigners and indeed their own racism.
But I guess at the end of the day it goes to the means of supressing the women and how successful they are. Niqabs and seperate rooms for women are great ways for sneaking your male lover into the house.
Their own means for keeping the women in place are often used to break the very ideas they are meant to enforce.
Never under estimate the will of the Saudi woman to get around the road blocks placed in their way.
Posted by: Abu Sinan at January 26, 2007 01:14 PM
I guess the assumption is that whilst Saudi women should not be with males they are unrelated to that they would not consider messing around with the foreign (thought inferior) driver.
now, that reminds me of Romans and their slaves. She did? Oh, heavens, how disgusting!
Posted by: Klaus
at January 26, 2007 06:17 PM
Off topic: Didn't know where to put this. That's the Magic Kingdom alright.
Posted by: Klaus
at January 26, 2007 11:32 PM
The desexualization of the "inferior" foreigner is funny...I suppose Saudi men see them as the eunuchs of old. A friend who works in Saudi told me that foreign men are allowed to work behind the counter at women-only malls, because women can't do those jobs and the foreign men are considered asexual and non-threatening, but Saudi girls flirt outrageously with and even paw some of the foreign male workers in the malls.
Posted by: SP at January 27, 2007 03:27 AM
Off topic again: Did anyone catch this?
Posted by: Klaus
at January 27, 2007 06:09 AM

RSS





