« The reality of Islam and the Republic | Dubai, the Attraction »
October 03, 2006
My Fieldtrip to the Right Blogosphere
Apart from daily scans of the Aggregator, I don't have a lot of time to spend reading blogs of any political/religious stripe. I'm not sure how often our contributors venture out into the wider blogosphere either, let alone cultivate relationships/flamewars with other blogs. My mental image of 'Aqoul somewhat resembles a secluded house on the outskirts of a chaotic city, a bit like Professor X's mansion (I'm sure this will lead to a bizarre side discussion on which X-Men are most like our authors/regulars, but let's try to stay focused).
In any case, I don't follow the daily mumblings of ignorant morons wanking on about dhimmitude and the infinite evils of Islam, nor do I routinely comment on blogs other than this one. Perhaps I'm a victim of the echo chamber effect, but I think it has more to do with wanting to spare myself the frustration of seeing the same Islamophobic glurge repeated over and over until it magically becomes fact.
That said, there do seem to be a few right-slanted bloggers who have cottoned on to the fact that conflating terrorism with Islam or Muslims (in a grossly generalized sense) does not lend itself to productive policymaking. Rather, it invites reassuring "solutions" involving isolation, segregation, expulsion, or worse for people who look, dress or behave suspiciously (be they Muslim or otherwise). Unfortunately, they do seem to be fighting an uphill battle against demagogues and hawks who find simple black-and-white conclusions far easier to digest.
Take Dean Esmay, for example. Never heard of him until Wafa Sultan won her 15 minutes of fame when MEMRI translated (and heavily edited) a clip of her and an Islamic scholar arguing on al-Jazeera. Much of the Western media (and blogosphere) took the video at face value, and praised Sultan for her "bravery". Even when confronted with our full transcript, many commenters were still taken in by her clever spin. Dean, on the other hand, carefully examined the source material and drew far more reasonable and balanced conclusions about the whole affair.
Recently, Esmay called on conservatives (in particular the odious Michelle Malkin) to be more precise with their terminology:
I'm making an open appeal to your conscience, Michelle Malkin, and to the conscience of conservatives everywhere: shouldn't you start making a distinction between Muslims who hate us and want to kill us, and Muslims who believe in freedom, democracy, and religious tolerance?And yes, I call myself a liberal, although I voted for Bush twice and have been an avowed Hawk since 9/11. I hate terrorists and giggle like a schoolgirl when one of them dies. I'm liberal on many issues but not on this: our enemies need to be hunted down and killed without remorse or pity. If we capture them alive, then we should extract the maximum possible information from them, so as to help round up and capture or kill their fellow terrorists.
It's all too easy to just make "the muslims" the enemy isn't it? But I honestly think that doing so greatly harms the war effort. Indeed, it makes enemies out of people who would otherwise be our friends.
Naturally Malkin fired back, but her overall argument was weakened by a cheap opening salvo accusing Dean of traffic-baiting (the whole thing is rather amusingly summarized on jinn's blog -- this does not mean I endorse her meme-craziness, etc).
Dean replied calmly to Michelle's spewing invective, and pressed on by proposing a weekly roundup of the "worst, most unhinged Muslim-baiting and Muslim-haiting found in the blogosphere".
Now I'm not sure if this is worth his time, but it certainly signals his frustration with certain factions on the far Right who don't seem to understand that villifying over a billion people doesn't serve Western strategic interests. Quite the opposite.
Perhaps someone has done this already, but I would find it useful if someone assembled the top 100 retarded misconceptions (e.g. "Islam was spread by the sword") about Islam/Arabs/MENA and clarified/refuted them point by point (obviously not handwaving apologia, but pointed and precise criticism, where necessary). Should we be doing that?
Posted by eerie at October 3, 2006 08:16 PM
Filed Under: Islam General
, Media
, Society & Culture
, Terrorism
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.aqoul.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/2986
Comments
(I'm sure this will lead to a bizarre side discussion on which X-Men are most like our authors/regulars, but let's try to stay focused)
oh, now you're just asking for it.
Dean seems to call for examples of hate speech, not misconceptions. Though I think the misconceptions part would be more useful as a reference, I think.
Posted by: Klaus
at October 4, 2006 03:58 AM
oh, now you're just asking for it.
I was simply beating DrDoug to the punch.
Oh, and I bet you want to be Wolverine. Everyone wants to be Wolverine.
More seriously, I think Dean won't have much trouble finding instances of hate speech. I suppose embarrasing those bloggers might be useful, but I think he'll just get dogpiled (hasn't Malkin already accused him of being a dhimmi?).
I'd probably enjoy investigating and explaining myths and misconceptions, if I knew what they were.
Posted by: eerie
at October 4, 2006 11:06 AM
"Perhaps someone has done this already, but I would find it useful if someone assembled the top 100 retarded misconceptions (e.g. "Islam was spread by the sword") about Islam/Arabs/MENA and clarified/refuted them point by point (obviously not handwaving apologia, but pointed and precise criticism, where necessary). Should we be doing that?"
eerie,
Well, on the one hand I think it would be helpful for those readers who come to Aqoul on an infrequent basis (or who are new readers). Personally, I would like to see something available here, if only as a reference point (can direct others to the site to get the facts or use it when debating cretinous morons elsewhere).
On the other hand, having someone here do the work necessary to create such a list would entail time and energy wading through cesspools of the right blogosphere. Do you (or someone else) really want to spend time at Little Green Footballs (where it's Islamofacists, every day, all the time)? I know I wouldn't.
Posted by: eponymous at October 4, 2006 11:28 AM
I'll get things started since I've encountered more misperceptions than I can shake a stick at:
-Muhammad was a pedophile
-Muhammad had a tribe of Jews massacred for absolutely no reason
-Islam is inherently irrational(the pope's argument, because god is above human reason, including right and wrong)
-Islam preaches violence against anyone who isn't Muslim
-Muslims refuse to assimilate in Western countries
-Islam is inherently despotic and/or Muslims "don't understand" democracy
-Most/all Sunnis hate Shias and most/all Shia hate Sunnis, that they always have and always will
-No self proclaimed Muslim drinks alcohol or goes unveiled, etc.
-A Muslim woman who wears a veil is automatically more conservative than a Muslim woman who doesn't wear a veil
Arabs:
-the only thing that Arabs understand/respect is force
-Arabs are more pious than Americans
-Arab "video clips" are less racy than American music videos
-Most Muslims are Arabs
-Arabs are secretly plotting against Muncie, Indiana
-Arabs all look alike
-An Arab who supports Israel is "moderate"
Posted by: Djuha at October 4, 2006 01:54 PM
me neither. I also think the misconception list is more helpful, I certainly don't need evidence of muslimhate. A few off the top of my head:
Dhimmi as slavery etc.
Muslims only supported Nazis during WWII.
Muslims want to establish a caliphate in Europe.
Islam was spread by the sword, because that's what the Quran commands them to, and Muslims always do what it says.
It is islamic custom to do honour killings. So are female genital mutilations.
Muslim terrorists are motivated by the Quran, not by politics.
They hate our freedom.
Muslims are tribal.
The French riots were a Muslim intifada in Europe.
-
Posted by: Klaus
at October 4, 2006 02:12 PM
Great! This is a great idea. I am tired of seeing some wannabe rightie Bushite whankers go on about how Islam is evil..etc. and then when I point out that they have their facts wrong or that there are different interpretations they accuse me of being a terrorist sympathizer or a dhimmi. The funny thing is that almost none of these people have ever been to the Middle East. At best some of them can come up with "I worked on an oil platform in the Gulf".
Other misconceptions:
All Muslims practice taqiyya, which the whanker haters translate as "lying to infidels"
Muslims are on a hidden mission to convert the entire world to Islam (the Eurabia theory)... sounds kind of like what people were saying about the Jews back in the day (the Protocols of the Elders of Zion theory)
Non-Muslims in Muslim countries still pay the jizyah (when in fact that has long ago gone out of style)
Posted by: showtime at October 4, 2006 04:16 PM
I'll get back to the serious stuff shortly. First, I submit that Meph should be Storm. Second, Captain Britain looks pretty cool.
Posted by: eerie
at October 4, 2006 06:39 PM
Hmm, suppose Storm and I do have some synergy background wise, and I love the outfits. Ability to control the weather though? Not sure about the kick ass factor of that particular talent, would come in handy in London however..
I would Captain Britain.
Posted by: Meph at October 4, 2006 07:08 PM
I'd go with Gambit, but I admit my cajun accent isn't that great:
Posted by: Tamerlane at October 4, 2006 07:15 PM
Oh that's not fair Tamerlane, you get your own mini series and all I get is some lame ride named after me. I guess Hale Berry played me so we're even.
Posted by: Meph at October 4, 2006 07:21 PM
For a lot of those misconceptions, it could simply be a matter of finding good sources and assembling them. Doesn't always have to be original, but properly cited with credible sources would be a step in the right direction.
Hmm, perhaps I should go with Psylocke (or Scarlet Witch, who is techically evil but no matter).
Posted by: eerie
at October 4, 2006 07:23 PM
BTW, I came across this Marvel superhero who wears a niqab...rather reminds me of our bint.
Posted by: eerie
at October 4, 2006 07:38 PM
How about "all Arabs are Muslims"?
This seems very common--a lot of people are surprised to hear that quite a few Arabs (indeed, a majority among Arabs in the U.S./Arab-Americans) are not Muslims.
Posted by: Kao Hsienchih
at October 5, 2006 12:31 AM
eerie,
Maybe another approach might be to identify sources that are suspect and to highlight what's suspect about them. Or maybe identify elements from those sources that are suspect and provide corrections to them.
I'm thinking along the lines of Raphael Patai's "The Arab Mind" - loads of suspect material within it (one should be able to find reviews of the book online that are critical).
Another is "Why I Am Not A Muslim" which is a polemic against Islam from an ex-pat Pakistani living in the US. The author does provide some good arguments, but clearly has an ax to grind.
Food for thought...
Oh, and I agree with Kao - the "All Arabs are Muslims" misconception is one encounter when teaching World Regional Geography. Students are also quite surprised to learn that Indonesia is the largest Muslim country in the world (followed by Pakistan and Bangladesh).
Posted by: eponymous at October 5, 2006 08:47 AM
(a) Where's my Marvel post? It is a cat, right? Though I suppose it could be an albino lynx or something.
(b) Not only should you make this list, but you should put it, along with the Wafa Sultan transcript, the how-to-be-a-moderate-muslim-table, the Sheikh novel graph, and other posts that involved real work and will stay interesting for a long time, under a special heading. Aqoul Articles or something like that.
(c) Off the top of my head:
- All Arabs are Muslims.
- All Muslims are Arabs.
- There is no Arab/Muslim art or literature worth checking out.
- Polygamy is very commong among Muslims/Arabs.
- Shia Muslims are more pro-American/moderate/less Muslim than Sunnis (or reverse).
- It is a religious duty for a Muslim to participate in violent Jihad to expand Islam.
- And a real favorite: "Islam means submission", as understood in the slavery & repression sense.
Posted by: alle at October 5, 2006 10:11 AM
Hmm, this is a big can of worms. Wondering if I should create some kind of Encyclopedia Islamophobia sub-blog...
Posted by: eerie
at October 5, 2006 11:34 AM
(a) Where's my Marvel post? It is a cat, right? Though I suppose it could be an albino lynx or something.
Uh, I blame the CIA. Can you repost?
Posted by: eerie
at October 5, 2006 02:18 PM
I personally can't wait for "in Lebanon, bestiality is legal, as long as it's with a female animal" to start to be quoted as authoratatively true.
Posted by: Tom Scudder at October 5, 2006 02:46 PM
Uh, I blame the CIA.
Oh, so that's the three-letter word. Explains a lot.
Can you repost?
Certainly not. But I can tell you I had you slated as White Queen.
Posted by: alle at October 5, 2006 06:56 PM
Certainly not. But I can tell you I had you slated as White Queen.
You're not the first person to say that.
(yes, I have a lot of nerdy friends)
Anyway, I'm going to think about how to implement this anti-Islamophobia idea, post some thoughts on my blog and get some feedback, etc.
In the meantime, feel free to continue the X-Men discussion here (L = Mr. Sinister? Raf = Cyclops?)
Posted by: eerie
at October 5, 2006 07:23 PM
As I am not a blogger at Aqoul, perhaps I can lay claim to Magneto ?
Posted by: mark at October 5, 2006 11:29 PM
Hmm, I think that fits rather well.
Posted by: eerie
at October 5, 2006 11:45 PM
Heh.
Off to form a Brotherhood of Evil Mutant Bloggers....
Posted by: mark at October 6, 2006 12:33 AM
A few of my favourites:
-The people of the Levant and North Africa were replaced by Arabs during some long ago Arab Conquest (a la Native Americans).
-Arabs (Muslims even) are ethnically homogeneous.
-There are no churches or synagogues in Muslim countries.
-Anti-Semitism was greater the Middle East.
-Muslim countries are dangerous.
-All Saudis are rich (it's not about Islam, but it gets me)
-All Arab countries are like Saudi Arabia (now updated to Afghanistan)
I don't know if you will be getting into the Isr-Pal situation, but here are a few:
-There is no Palestine.
-There are over 20 Arab countries; Why don't they take them?
Posted by: Ali K at October 6, 2006 12:41 AM
Almost forgot:
-Iran, Pakistan, and Afghanistan are Arab countries.
Posted by: Ali K at October 6, 2006 12:44 AM
eerie, I'd love to help, but I'm just no expert. There are others on this blog far more knowledgeable than me on these fact-finding matters. I can do the most simple stuff, but not the more complex ones. I'll see what I can do.
Posted by: Klaus
at October 6, 2006 04:05 AM
What the bloody fuck is wrong with you people? Is this nonsense actually about coloured comic books?
Posted by: The Lounsbury at October 6, 2006 09:11 AM
Well on the subject of Palestine.
Another favorite of mine.
"Palestine was an empty land before the Jews came in in the 19th century. The Palestinians are actually recent immigrants." I don't know where people get this from
Posted by: showtime at October 6, 2006 09:39 AM
What the bloody fuck is wrong with you people? Is this nonsense actually about coloured comic books?
Ah, the curmudgeon's home. Welcome back.
Re getting into retarded Israeli-Palestinian spin, I see little point in debunking every bit of trivia because it distracts from real issues (although that might be a useful thing to point out for all sorts of dumb I-P arguments).
Posted by: eerie
at October 6, 2006 10:20 AM
Bah, economic policy is ignored, but speculating about what bloody comic book character one is gets 30 odd responses?
Posted by: The Lounsbury at October 6, 2006 01:13 PM
I would like to re-emphasize the send up fo the Western media darling Muslim moderates (Wafa Sultan, etc). There do not seem to be a lot of people here not taking them at face value.
Posted by: Netbrian at October 6, 2006 01:23 PM
Bah, economic policy is ignored, but speculating about what bloody comic book character one is gets 30 odd responses?
Not necessarily ignored, more likely that people haven't got the expertise to add substantial commentary.
On the other hand, nearly everyone has read comic books. Even little Green Book lovers like you, I'm sure.
Posted by: eerie
at October 6, 2006 02:33 PM
Yes, when I was 12.
A stage that passed with merciful brevity.
Well, I can't change the peculiarities of internet people.
Posted by: The Lounsbury at October 6, 2006 02:55 PM
What the bloody fuck is wrong with you people? Is this nonsense actually about coloured comic books?
See, we should switch to talking about CEREBUS.
Or maybe TEENAGE MUTANT NINJA TURTLES (the original run) - was it actually any good to start out with, before they got discovered and extremely rich?
Posted by: Tom Scudder at October 6, 2006 03:41 PM
"What the bloody fuck is wrong with you people? Is this nonsense actually about coloured comic books?"
Sorry, I can't help but love the big "L".
If I was the comic book character it would be the girl who took the essence of life from whoever she touched. Although I am neither female nor a person of want, she took reality away from those who believed. While it is cool to control the potential between the positive and negative poles (magneto), she controlled the poles themselves, or that which is real.
As for Arabs, I will always be grateful for how one Arab treated my father. Although I think the Arab who treated my father with great respect happened to be Christian, I see all Arabs as people of great worth. I am not sure if I know any Muslims. I assume there are some who would respect me and some who would not. I respect those who respect me and respect those who respect themselves.
Posted by: Larry Dunbar at October 8, 2006 08:17 PM

RSS





