dear e,

YES!!!

--raf*

dear E:

i love you. marry me?

Dr. Doug: you'll have to get in line, I fear. Too bad apostates don't generally engage in polyandry, even the ones predisposed toward marriage.

Oh but oh giggle. I can't stop using it.

Right now the main issue is lack of words. I spent only a few minutes coming up with Lounsburyisms, so there aren't that many combinations. More words = better insults.

Wonderful, it makes me feel all serene like. We might dispense with the real Lounsbury now.

He doesn't really look like that, does he?

He doesn't really look like that, does he?

Why, would it make you all googly-moogly if he did?

DrDoug: i love you. marry me?

You haven't even filled out the bloody form. There is a procedure, do try to follow it.

oh, E. you're such a tease!

will you put a link off the front page to access the quote generator or are we going to have to remember the URL?

also, could you provide a list of everything you've added so far and a procedure for us to submit new words?

This is completely perfect. I was an "anti-globo moron." The word "blithering" also appeared. I am in awe.

Why, would it make you all googly-moogly if he did?

Yes, it might actually...I pictured him more like this.

klaus: he doesn't look like that right now. his hair hasn't fully grown back yet.

btw, e: expect a filled out form this evening.

DrDoug: I added a few more phrases for good measure. The source code has the full array.

Will probably link to the generator from the sidebar.

Eerie knows what I look like. Ask her.

3 parts Hugh Grant, 4 parts Robert Sean Leonard and 1 part Pierce Brosnan (of course Brosnan-007 is a longstanding inside joke around here).

There, that's vague enough to keep me from getting shot in the head later.

Floppy hair, I did have. The chicas do miss it, but growing back.

I used to think the picture on the old site (assuming it actually is the Lounsbury's picture) looked like Duke from Dunesbury, except with hair. Since L is apparently without much hair at the moment, I'm getting curious.....

Well, it's not exactly Pierce Brosnan, but surely he must look something like this.

Hah, that pic is hilarious.

What's all this rubbish about Pierce Brosnan? This is Lounsbury in my mind and none of this is going to change it.

Ali K: no no! L is much younger and less outwardly frumpy than that!

maybe this is a fitting compromise between the deamon and the grumpy truthteller. Or this, a handsome expat businessman, or this, the corrupt expat image.

Indeed, finding that balance was my intent with the "man-recipe" above. Hugh Grant (charming scummy cad), Robert Sean Leonard (clean cut, perhaps a bit nerdy) and Pierce Brosnan (007).

Of course, all this breathless speculation is just going to give L a swelled head. Moreso.

DrDoug-
Nope, that's him all right.

e: so you're saying he's in danger of ending up looking like this?

Funny, I see him more as Andy Rooney, though less stupid.

"Did'ja ever notice how the whankers just keep coming? Why is that?"

I've met the legend on multiple occasions.

He looks like a cross between Wilfred Thesiger and Clark Gable, with a steely glint in his eye.

with some tweaks you could run a great comment spam campaign with this

Surely there is something more important for us to write about than me, yes?

L: you are the centre of the Aqoul universe. nothing is more important.

> L: you are the centre of the Aqoul universe. nothing is more important.

You say that *now*, but methinks nekkid Eerie pics would easily shift the balance.

I say this purely as a matter of fact, you understand.

You gibbering illiterate mouth-breathing morons, do you have nothing more to talk about than one fucking contributor's abusive scatological rants. Have you no fucking lives you stupid gits?

Typical bloody foolish internet Righty-Lefty ideocreep moronic puke-laden fucking imbecilles.

(Human made. Man versus machine: Man -1; Machine - 0.)

Blue: i hadn't thought of that. you are quite right.

blue: that way lies madness.

Madness... euphoria... these are subtle distinctions.

Much as I would like to tip the universe in favor of myself, the proposed approach might slightly undermine the mandate of this site (which, afaik, does not include "lewd photos of the Ed. in Chief")

they would hardly be lewd. i think we could come up with several other words to better describe the photos.