« First As Tragedy, Then As Farsi: Ahmadinejad's Letter | Ahmadinejad's 1953 Reference: The Skeleton in the Regime's Closet Reaching Out? »
May 11, 2006
Dubai: Economic Cannibalisation?
FT's William Wallace - a reporter working from Cairo who I am coming to look forward to - has an interesting article on Dubai, Building ambition raises Middle East financial stakes, that merits a read by those of us who follow the place.
The shortest version, speculation that the Dubai model of free zones and specialised development "cities" is reaching the end of its logic with its proliferation in Dubai and copying of the concept among on the part of neighbours, as in Qatar. I beleive there is something to this, the issue of diminishing returns off of the strategy.
That being said, Dubai has been written off frequently in the past, and queerly the problems of its neighbours (Bahrain, Iraq, to an extent KSA, Iran) will help, I believe, feed continued growth, although Qatar may siphon off some degree of business that would go to Dubai.
On the third hand, so to speak, there are clear signs that Dubai is bumping up against diminishing returns to its strategy and lack of pan-Emirati integration is a problem - e.g. that Sharjah childishly refuses to cooperate with Dubai (it would logically be the bedroom community for Dubai, perhaps especially for the more conservative residents who are uncomfortable with Sin City) and tries incompetently to compete. I recall I was stunned at the poor interconnexions that our own Dubaiwalla showed me a couple years go (or so).
In its bid to become the business capital of the Middle East, Dubai already had purpose-built business parks for most sectors of the economy by the time it opened the Dubai International Financial Centre in 2004.Property analysts now see a risk that Dubai's proliferating free zones covering everything from media to sports and finance, may start to cannibalise each other once the next rash of mega projects are complete.
The same could prove the case on a regional scale as rival Gulf states seek to mimic Dubai's success in attracting regional headquarters of businesses and banks with glitzy new property developments.
Saudi Arabia announced plans this week to complete construction of a new $6.7bn financial district in Riyadh by 2010. The goal is to accommodate and modernise its own expanding financial sector using technological and regulatory standards that match those of major global financial centres.
Frankly I see zero chance that Saudi developments will actually compete with Dubai - whatever Saudi goals, their domestic incentive structure and infantilely impoverished conception of 'Islamisation' of their financial sector guarantee that only Saudi institutions or foreign operations without a choice will actually locate their operations in KSA. Imposing, e.g. the use of the Islamic calender for banking operations rather than a solar calender for financial operations needlessly raises costs (and in fact banks really follow solar, and rejigger reporting to the authorities to disguise - usual Wahhabite hoop jumping myopic legalistic idiocies).
However, the authorities have signalled longer-term ambitions for Riyadh to become the financial capital of the Middle East.
Yeah.
Riiiiiiiiiiiiight.
Well, Saudi authorities are affflicted with all kinds of self-delusions as well as handicaps imposed by the short-thobed cretin section of their populace.
If these were emanating now from another of the smaller Gulf states - half of whom, Bahrain, Dubai and Qatar, have already announced their own ambitions to be the Middle East's financial capital - it might have caused amusement. But as the region's economic powerhouse, Saudi Arabia's ambitions usually count."It's only normal that Saudi Arabia will be the major financial centre because it is the biggest economy and the largest market. This is not to belittle the Dubai International Financial Exchange," said Beshr Bekheet of Bekheet Financial Advisors in Riyadh. Ultimately, he said, Dubai may play Hong Kong to Riyadh's Shanghai.
No, I'd say I would take Bahraini or Qatari pretensions in this area more seriously than Saudi ones.
The Saudi economy is hydrocarbons and consumption.
Sure, the tons of cash flowing into KSA are now feeding wealth growth, first time in 30 odd years actually, but its in concentrated hands, and frankly the main benificeraries like having off-shore activities.
No, while the mechanical progress of prices for hydrocarbons in the near to medium term are surely going to keep the Gulf awash in more liquidity than their economies ex-hydrocarbons would justify, I do not imagine KSA will have anything but a domestic financial sector, and even some important percentage of domestic business will like to be in Bahrain or Dubai...
Major financial center my ass.
Outside Riyadh, analysts were more sceptical.
Yeah, no kidding and no surprise.
"In order to be a regional financial centre of any scope it has to serve a bigger area. The market has to be liberal and open and it has to be an attractive place to live to accommodate the polyglot nature of the financial workforce," said an analyst in Dubai.While Bahrain has the longest track record as a regional centre for offshore and Islamic banking, recent momentum has been behind Dubai, with global investment banks - including Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs - moving large-scale operations to the city in a bid to capture business generated by the oil boom.
Also Dubai relative to Bahrain has set up better infrastructure and has a better image on the stability front (although the quasi-indentured foreign labour job protests have cast a light on a dark underbelly and a potential emergant threat).
The Dubai International Financial Centre was conceived both to complement the emirate's fast growing trade and tourism sectors and to capitalise on a gap in financial services between Europe and Asia.Qatar has neither a developed financial sector nor much business yet outside the energy industry. What it does have is almost limitless funds generated from gas and the allure of more than $100bn in projects in the coming four years.
Philip Thorpe, who helped build the regulatory framework of the DIFC before moving to the Qatar Financial Centre last year, says the diplomatic view is that the various Gulf centres will develop niche markets and end up complementing each other.
"It's more likely though that over time some of the centres will be more successful than others," he said. "If Saudi builds a centre and all the other components are of London or Frankfurt quality it would be a very attractive proposition. Whether it will or not is hard to judge."
Kha.
Nicely done, Thorpe.
I have to say I doubt that Qatar can really make a run on Dubai - although they might succeed if Dubai fucks and has a nasty scandal boil out into the open. They've managed to sleaze by a number of potential big ones, and there are a number of firms that I frankly think are money laundering machines (some I have been on the other side of transactions with that stank to high heaven. And I knew my MD was sleaze....).
Now, it is a pity Wallace focused exclusively on the fin sector, although that is presently the buzz as the Khalij has stupid amounts of liquidity and all the world's scum are circling about like buzzards around a corpse looking at ways to get a piece of the action.
By the way, Dubai is getting more popular as a subject in US media, as this little NYT arty on another Dubai "city" makes clear It's Not a Mirage: Dubai Is Building a Sports Oasis
[UPDATE]
An arty on the KSA Fin Center subject from the New York Times
Not fundamentally interesting except that I would say rewind around 5 years and this would be smaller arty if published at all.
Regardless, the quote
"Dubai is a very cosmopolitan place, and the Saudis will have difficulty selling themselves the same way," said Benn Steil, director for international economics of the Council on Foreign Relationsis perfectly correct.
Posted by The Lounsbury at May 11, 2006 12:10 PM
Filed Under: Economic Policy
, Gulf
, MENA Region General
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.aqoul.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/2643
Comments
Sharjah childishly refuses to cooperate with Dubai
Dubai's record of cooperation with the other emirate that it borders, Abu Dhabi, is also poor. Just to even things out, Abu Dhabi and Sharjah don't get along perfectly either. This is partly because the federal government isn't as strong as it should be, or, for that matter, sufficiently independent from the governments of the individual emirates.
Qatar may siphon off some degree of business that would go to Dubai
Qatar has neither a developed financial sector nor much business yet outside the energy industry. What it does have is almost limitless funds generated from gas and the allure of more than $100bn in projects in the coming four years.
Qatar's stated goal has therefore been to create a niche for itself in project finance.
Philip Thorpe, who helped build the regulatory framework of the DIFC before moving to the Qatar Financial Centre
'Moving' is a very diplomatic way to put things. My understanding of things is that he was frog-marched out of his office after publicly questioning the Powers That Be.
...Dubai fucks and has a nasty scandal boil out into the open. They've managed to sleaze by a number of potential big ones
I'm frankly surprised that more wasn't made of Thorpe's departure.
As for Dubai bidding for the 2016 or 2020 Olympics, as mentioned in the NYT article, this idea has been bandied about here, and the Sports City does sound like something the government wants to see built, but frankly, it strikes me as being phenomenonally wasteful.
They want to build massive stadiums that will probably only ever be used for one event, as there is no indigenous need for them. Sharjah used to have a very hard time filling in 20,000 seats at its cricket tournaments despite low ticket prices, world class stars, and hundreds of thousands of people in the vicinity who were interested in the game. The only people who used to come were those with free tickets. The local football league wasn't even fully professional when I last checked, and entrance to stadiums was free- although expatriate attendance was nil in a country where expats made up 85% of the population. I haven't seen any feasibility studies, but it sounds to me like a massive, massive white elephant. Granted, people have reached the same conclusions before about Dubai's mega projects, which have been rather successful so far, but I think they are overreaching.
Posted by: dubaiwalla
at May 11, 2006 06:03 AM
DW
Qatar's stated goal has therefore been to create a niche for itself in project finance.
It's not terribly convincing to me - although building up local capacity to work on own project financing is theoretically attractive and a specialisation I suppose can be leveraged to work on regional project finance business.
Philip Thorpe, "moving" to the Qatar Financial Centre
'Moving' is a very diplomatic way to put things. My understanding of things is that he was frog-marched out of his office after publicly questioning the Powers That Be.
I am not sure it was that dramatic, but yes.
The incident was re some very, very serious internal governance problems, Thorpe and some board members question the whiff of self-dealing. Stench actually.
Dubai sleazing by a number of potential big scandals:
I'm frankly surprised that more wasn't made of Thorpe's departure.
They did manage to get by the rather quickly. I rather thought it was going to blow up, and that gave me some pleasure at the time given a connexion with someone I would have liked to have seen burned.
Posted by: The Lounsbury at May 11, 2006 12:22 PM
lack of pan-Emirati integration is a problem
Yah. As in, a couple of the Emirates, I think Sharjah and Ajman, can't even agree on PAVING THE FRIGGING ROADS joining them, so there's a godawful patch of 500 m. of unpaved road some half-hour to an hour north of Dubai.
Posted by: Tom Scudder at May 11, 2006 01:39 PM
" that Dubai is bumping up against diminishing returns to its strategy and lack of pan-Emirati integration is a problem - e.g. that Sharjah childishly refuses to cooperate with Dubai (it would logically be the bedroom community)"
My understanding from more serious China-watchers is that this same phenomena is happening on a much larger scale in the PRC, as cities "compete" on redundantly similar development projects - driven partly by traditional rivalries, intra CCP politics and the greed of local bigwigs.
Posted by: mark safranski at May 11, 2006 03:33 PM

RSS





