« Financial Times Bitten By the Wafa Bug | 'Aqoul Books & Media, Guest Author, etc. »
March 20, 2006
Florence Eid on Development
So what CAN be done to help the Middle East in a more liberal, prosperous, etc direction? One person who's been approaching it from an entiredly different direction from the political reformers is Florence Eid, who as a professor at the American University of Beirut pushed hard on the idea of entrepreneurship education.
In her major paper on the subject, which is available in a couple different forms on the net (this one is a straight PDF download; this one has been somewhat revised but requires a free registration to access), she argues that what the region needs right now is NOT more financing - liquidity (as has been noted elsewhere on this blog) is very high in the region (though a bit lower now than it was three weeks ago, thanks to the Gulf markets' "corrections"). Instead, what is needed is
to create the "institutional complementarities" necessary for the financial sector to leverage [entrepreneurial] talent... if financial institutions are not "complemented" with the right skills and know-how, they cannot create private sector activity; vice versa, if finance and skills are not "complemented" with regulatory institutions that serve their needs, they cannot create businesses that make profit, and drive the economy forward.
Her work relies heavily on actual interviews with actual businessmen and financial managers in the region:
Field research included interviews with firm managers in the MENA region, wishing to promote investment in entrepreneurship, but frustrated that the institutional structures necessary to mobilize private equity finance and entrepreneurial talent were missing. Finances and talent there were aplenty. The problem lay in efficiently matching the talent with the finance.
Her poll of two-thirds of the private equity firms investing in the MENA region (that is, 10 of them) indicated that the biggest obstacle they thought they faced was the "lack of business and entrepreneurial skills/ideas" - something that meshes with an interview I did a couple days ago with a professor of entrepreneurialism at AUB's business school, who said that the greatest shortcoming he found among his incoming students was a "lack of creativity - opening a new restaurant in downtown Beirut is not creative. I expect people to come up with things that aren't found in Dubai or in the West."
Eid argues for a slightly different emphasis than the now-traditional "Small and Medium Enterprises" (SME) strategy now a consensus in development circles:
'New firms' is a concept slightly different, but not excluding the now-established SME concept. Because it is based on firm size, the term SME can include enterprises that fit this category by virtue of their size, but are neither dynamic, nor growing, and therefore not necessarily competitive... A "new firm creation strategy" should aim, among other things, at the generation of firms capable of growing into the 'HPs' and 'Easyjets' of the region and not just at encouraging and supporting SMEs
In her discussion of "what is to be done", she mentions in passing "severe faults in institutional design" in several MENA countries (particularly Lebanon), but mainly concentrates on the importance of continuing support for and educaiton of entrepreneurs among NGOs and educational institutions, along with the development of private-equity firms that can help push those firms to the next level.
And what is the estimable Dr. Eid up to now? Having written about the importance of private equity in the Middle East for several years, she is now in a position to put her (well, other people's) money where her mouth is, as senior economist for the MENA region at J. P. Morgan.
Posted by tomscud at March 20, 2006 03:39 AM
Filed Under: Economic Development
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.aqoul.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/2509
Comments
Really, Florence moved on to JP Morgan since AUB?
Not really putting her money where her mouth is, sadly, as JP isn't in the kind of work that does what she was talking about.
Her papers, mind you, are decent ones, if a bit flawed (the surveys are skewed, but then given her means at AUB).
More on this later if I have time.
Posted by: collounsbury at March 20, 2006 11:05 AM
Please do. News of Florence's move was apparently not widely spread, given that a year on I've been a vector of news to a number of different people already.
Posted by: Tom Scudder at March 20, 2006 01:28 PM
I strongly disagree there's a lack of entrepreneurial spirit among Arabs. I've seen far more entrepreneurs and entrepreneurial candidates among North Africans and Levantines than I've ever seen among, say, the French or the (anglos and french) Canadians.
There are many, many other other flaws though. To sum up the most important that come to mind:
- Lack of business angels and venture capitalists. This basically leads to two big issues: lack of capital and lack of entrepreneurial skills, not spirit. Your only way to start up is love money, which is definitely very limited. No cash seƱor, and few are willing to sell papa's house to risk it on something like a high tech start-up. No mentors tampoco, nobody to help you avoid the newbie's mistakes and lose the little capital you have before you reach some stage of maturity.
- Corruption and legal insecurity are definitely big issues in quite a few places too. Many people simply won't invest, because they'd have to "share" their assets. I've even known a few who actually started up successful businesses and simply gave up because it became too "hot" for their tastes.
- General lack of professionalism of the labor force. Too many things I'd classify in this category. From people who don't understand the basics of quality and their Sean Penn's U-Turn service level, to people who aren't task oriented and their "get-me-paid-for-showing-up" culture.
- Lack of technical experience. You have to train. And as soon as you give the training, zip, they're elsewhere for a higher wage. The churn for the competent is a real problem. You have to pay to keep them, sometimes to the point that they can be even less competitive than a Canadian.
- Lack of commercial networks in the big markets. Local markets are a joke. For example, in the IT services market, I don't remember the exact numbers for the three countries of the Maghreb combined, but it was in the few tens of million dollars. Compare it to the not-so-dynamic 30+ billions worth French market. You don't become the next "HP" or the next "easyJet" if you don't think export. And thinking export means you have to have efficient networks outside.
So, what is my advice to the Arab who wants to create his business? Well... It's go for a "restaurant in downtown Beirut". The bets would be much more in your favor than the Russian roulette style idea of an Arab high-tech start-up. Not that the high tech start-up is a bad idea. It's definitely needed and rewards can be significant in case of success. But we're not there yet. The Arab start-up isn't going to cost much less than doing it in Europe or North America, and it sure will give you much more trouble. At the individual level, before one can take such a risk and try something as big as a small Arab start-up, it's wiser to garantee some minimal return on your capital.
Posted by: Shaheen at March 20, 2006 07:12 PM
Shaheen:
I know I've quoted Florence before, her academic work was pretty interesting (although professionally I can note that this "Her poll of two-thirds of the private equity firms investing in the MENA region (that is, 10 of them)" is incorrect - well not Tom's writing but her survey's characterisatin of 2/3 PE firms is and was wrong).
Moving along I agree there is a huge amount of energy in the region. One day we should have a drink and I will tell you how I decided against all reason to specialise in MENA area, but it was from observing this as a student.
The key issues in my mind are institutional strangling of innovation and effort.
I very much agree with your list, I'd write a very similar analysis. Indeed I suspect our only difference would be POV really.
Lack of business angels and venture capitalists.
There is some change here, mostly institutional rather than angel, but not enough.
Corruption and legal insecurity are definitely big issues in quite a few places too.
Again, getting better, but not bloody fast enough.
Commenting on this:
Many people simply won't invest, because they'd have to "share" their assets. I've even known a few who actually started up successful businesses and simply gave up because it became too "hot" for their tastes.
Yup, and this kills off all kinds of growth. I recall as investment officer being told by one of our companies part of their commercial strategy (in Gulf) was to make price points too low to be attractive to the "brown paper envelope syndrome" - a whole upside taken off the table.
General lack of professionalism of the labor force.
I think the real problem here is that the government sector has set a pricing on labour that's too high relative to actual skill levels. I'm of the opinion this is waaay worse in the Gulf of course.
- Lack of technical experience. See above.
The churn for the competent is a real problem. You have to pay to keep them, sometimes to the point that they can be even less competitive than a Canadian.
For a number of reasons I find the emphasised (and ripped from context) section hilarious.
- Lack of commercial networks in the big markets.
Right. And shit poor infrastructure, although often because of... wait for it, idiotic management. Casa Port to Amsterdam is the same time as Shanghia Amsterdam. Certainly not because of the kilometrage.
I need to get back to this meat subject matter as here.
Of course I'd advise against any Arab entrepreneur going into hi tech. Nope, go for middle stuff. Light mfg areas where time to market is important, but skills not so, leverage location and whatever price differentials you have.
IT bets... hoo boy.
Of course you may know Aregon.
Posted by: collounsbury at March 21, 2006 12:15 AM
Lounsbury,
One day we should have a drink and I will tell you how I decided against all reason to specialise in MENA area
It would be a great pleasure, really.
(S) Lack of business angels and venture capitalists.
(L) There is some change here, mostly institutional rather than angel, but not enough.
Institutions are not the answer. They're anything but effective players, so they can't mentor (and they don't), and they're not risk takers, whereas taking risks is what is needed in terms of financing start ups.
I think the real problem here is that the government sector has set a pricing on labour that's too high relative to actual skill levels.
It isn't just the government. When your skills are so rare on the local job market (like it's the case in IT for example), there's some kind of demand spiral that makes you able to very easily change jobs and earn more. The problem is, with such a spiral you reach a point where you're paid more than your real value. Big companies get to keep you at that price for the few key positions in which they have no better alternative, but it's extremely difficult to build a competitive structure that provides large scale services in your field.
The churn for the competent is a real problem. You have to pay to keep them, sometimes to the point that they can be even less competitive than a Canadian.
For a number of reasons I find the emphasised (and ripped from context) section hilarious.
Put that way, you're quite right, it gave me a good laugh too:)
And shit poor infrastructure, although often because of... wait for it, idiotic management. Casa Port to Amsterdam is the same time as Shanghia Amsterdam. Certainly not because of the kilometrage.
Right. I remember touring Tunisia and Morocco with a business partner for a project we were working on (he's in the logistics sector). It was his first time in MENA and it stroke him as so obvious he didn't stop commenting on that. It didn't really occur to me as part of the top problems because I'm more into dematerialized services (particularly, but not limited to, IT). Logistics are not the major bottleneck there (though telecommunication infrastructure could use some upgrade and QA). It definitely is in manufacturing though.
Of course you may know Aregon.
Honestly, not before you told me about it and I googled it. But then, it's a B2C company oriented towards local markets, while I'm more into B2B exportation.
Posted by: Shaheen at March 21, 2006 07:56 PM

RSS





