« Democracy, Liberalism, Consequences | Complete utter nonsense: "Offended by Cartoons" Muslim Pinheads Boycott the Danes »


January 29, 2006

France, Islam & Discrimination: Further to the idiocy of the "European Intifada"

Further to my ongoing comments of the situation in France, the riots that some ill-informed, bigotted or just plain stupid commentators blew up into a "Muslim intifada" in Europe, an interesting article on current French efforts on addressing rampant discrimination in France.

(A side set of reading by the way from 2003, note the prescient commentary, intifada my ass, I note there is a clear connexion with MENA directly, besides the issue of Muslim minorities in Europe and the potential echoes within the Islamic word, the parallels in terms of illiberal economies with severe labour rigidities leading to high unemployment and difficulties in findings jobs)

A few comments, then.

French Firm Tests Colorblind Hiring
By John Ward Anderson

PARIS -- When the prime minister of France wanted a powerful, unimpeachable voice to recommend how to end job discrimination in the country, he turned to Claude Bebear, an outspoken takeover artist who had built a small regional insurance firm into the world's biggest.
Bebear, who saw racial discrimination as one of France's most deeply rooted and insidious problems, did not disappoint. In a report 14 months ago, he brought a largely hidden topic into full public view. Bebear laid out a series of proposed remedies, including a colorblind recruiting tool known as the "anonymous résumé."
Typically, in France, "they throw away the résumés of people who are from bad parts of town which are supposed to have Arabs or blacks," Bebear, 70, said in an interview. "When you have somebody whose name is Mohammed and he lives in St. Denis," a low-income community outside Paris, "you say, 'I won't bother with that one,' and so they don't even answer them."

What's peculiar here is that these facts (re "redlining" - to use an American term - of job applicants and rampant ethnic screening by name) are well-known, it's extraordinary how many commentators fell for the "Muslim" riots, rather than "discriminated against minorities still called immigrant in the third generation".

On the other hand, the anonymous resume strikes me as a dubious practical tool.

The solution, Bebear said, is to strip résumés of anything that could tip off recruiters to a person's racial, ethnic and national background or other information that could be used to discriminate -- name, age, sex, even residential postal code. "Then the man who is in charge of recruitment will look at that and say, 'Oh, that résumé is a very good one. Send me that guy,' and in the folder he has in front of him is an old black woman or a handicapped person."
Today, Bebear has made his company, AXA -- a 112,000-employee behemoth that receives 40,000 résumés a year in France alone -- a testing ground for anonymous résumés. The results from the first year are not yet in, but after minority youths rioted across France last fall, the concept is attracting growing support and helping to fuel a legislative debate.
Most of the youths who took part in the violence were from black and Muslim immigrant families that have lived in France for more than a generation but have never fully integrated into French society. Lack of decent-paying jobs was one of their main grievances.

Integration is a funny word here. It would seem to me that the issue is less "integration" than "opportunity" - it's not an issue of completely different culture, rather an issue

French President Jacques Chirac recently endorsed the use of anonymous résumés, and other politicians, big businesses and anti-discrimination groups are following suit. The powerful French bureaucracy, however, has been slow to embrace the idea, preferring to study it and weigh potential legal problems. Some people blame the government's tepid enthusiasm on a French mind-set that has hindered public discussion of the country's discrimination problem for decades.
"The idea of diversity is really only a year old here -- we were so sure of ourselves in terms of equity and equality that we never recognized that we had a racial problem in France, because a man was a man and nothing else," said Laurence Mehaignerie, an adviser to France's minister of equal opportunities. "It had to be something very violent, like these recent events, before we recognized that discrimination was at a very high level, and we started to realize there was a racial problem."
Among whites and minorities interviewed here, almost everyone agreed that there was racial prejudice in France. Some whites expressed concern that anonymous résumés would lead to minority quotas or affirmative action-style programs that could discriminate against them.

Emphasis added.

The core problem here is the economy, the rigidities in employment, low growth. Note on one hand the agreed issue of ethnic (better term than racial) prejudice, the concommitant fear of losing opportunities to "those who don't really belong."

Serge Simon, a 21-year-old French youth whose parents are Haitian, said he liked the idea. "I think that with an anonymous résumé, a person will be hired for what they are -- for their qualifications and not for the color of their skin," he said.
But Simon, a salesclerk at a clothing store in Place de Clichy, a working-class neighborhood in northern Paris, said he was skeptical about whether the idea would prove effective because, in the end, the French government couldn't mandate change. "The bosses have to change their behaviors and ideas," he said.
Hassen Akremi, a Tunisian with a master's degree in international public law, said he had studied and worked legally in France for 12 years -- but only in menial jobs. "Racism is cultural," he complained. "It is in the conscience of the French mentality." Simple programs such as anonymous résumés will not erase it, he predicted.
"The French people think the immigrants should always be at the service of the French," said Akremi, 37, who works at a Parisian cybercafe. He said he had sent out 1,000 résumés but never been called for a single interview, even though he speaks French, English and Arabic. The only jobs he has held he acquired through the Arab community in Paris, and most were minimum-wage, Akremi said.

Typical story, Akremi's - although certainly one of the problems facing France is the lack of job growth and a system of "social solidarity" that benefits those inside, and fucks those not.

It was France's refusal to confront discrimination or even discuss it that led the Montaigne Institute, a private Paris research center founded by Bebear five years ago, to study the issue. The goal was to "help solve it by describing accurately what it is, and breaking the taboos and the mythology about the integration of individuals regardless of their national origin," said the institute's director general, Philippe Maniere. "We live in a world of prejudice and myth. We wanted to show that discrimination exists and help France correct itself."

Emphasis added.

In many ways it's not surprising that someone like Bebear, an entrepreneur and with North American experience, saw the issues, I may add.

A report the institute published in 2004 cited a study showing that a job applicant with a French-sounding name was five times more likely to be called for an interview than someone with an identical résumé but an Arabic- or North African-sounding name. That bias contributed to unemployment rates as high as 40 percent -- four times the national average -- among young men in low-income communities outside Paris, according to the report.
Armed with such data, Bebear and the Montaigne Institute have persuaded about 300 companies -- including the Total energy group, the car manufacturer Peugeot Citroen, the steel giant Arcelor and SNCF, the national railway -- to sign a charter pledging to oppose discrimination and make their companies "reflect the diversity of France."
Among the recommendations in an accompanying report were that companies use anonymous résumés in hiring, produce annual reports charting progress in ending discrimination, and create internships to start young minority people on career paths.

Well, these sound like good things, I doubt they are enough, but they are good things. Major firms taking these steps are good standard setting measures, but it is not going to change overall market dynamics.

Bebear said the proposals were meant to correct inequities without American-style affirmative action programs, which are illegal under French law and viewed by many people here -- Bebear included -- as antithetical to French culture and society.

I'm afraid that antithetical or not, I don't see discriminatory habits changing without real incentives pushing this.

"If I hire someone not because he's competent but because he's black, immediately everyone in the company is going to think that blacks are unqualified," Bebear said. To him, affirmative action should principally mean better education, so that minorities will have "the same level of confidence as the others."
AXA adopted the use of anonymous résumés in January 2005. Peugeot began using them about eight months ago. Other companies have expressed interest in the idea and are working toward implementing it, but they are having problems devising software and other systems to ensure anonymity across large, diversified businesses, officials said.
Another problem is that, under French law, companies are not allowed to build databases that link the names of employees with their race or ethnic group. That, said Maniere, the Montaigne Institute director, is a deeply rooted reaction against the roundup of people from different ethnic groups during World War II.
Mehaignerie, the aide to the equal opportunities minister, said anonymous résumés were "a good tool," but she cautioned: "It seems to me we won't be able to go very far if we can't have data. If you can't know who's being recruited and how they're being promoted, how can you validate who's doing good and who's not?"
Samuel Thomas, vice president of the anti-discrimination group SOS-Racisme, said there were many ways to gauge whether a company discriminates in hiring without fancy software programs and extensive databases.
"So many people want to analyze more than they want to do," he said, calling anonymous résumés "a very important solution" to the problem of achieving colorblind hiring. "The first problem is not to study discrimination," he said. "The first problem is to fight discrimination and stop it."

The SOS Racisme position is understandable, but it strikes me the data is a necessary tool, shed light on actual conditions and practices.

Posted by The Lounsbury at January 29, 2006 06:38 PM
Filed Under: Business, Private , Ethnic Minorities , Islam General , MENA Region General , North Africa , Op-Ed , Religious Minorities , Society & Culture

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.aqoul.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/2328


Comments

Are there economic constraints that prevent immigrants and progeny from pursuing the option done in USA -- ignore the racism and start one's own business?

Posted by: matthew hogan at January 29, 2006 10:57 PM

Certainly.

Financing access across the board is harder to pull off in France for the entrepreneur (regardless of their origin, I would not hesitate to assert its a step worse for the "immigrant").

Second, French culture still does not have as much support for "entreprenurial" activities as a general matter, so there is less sociological support.

Third, the economy is far more rigid, and importantly, the fucking licensing including often having to get permissions from your competitors to enter the business (e.g. under the old pharmacy regime), etc. etc.

As a general matter, much less dynamic economy across the board, and the barriers to creation are really substantial (ceteris paribus). All the more so for those outside the system given the continued prevalence of old guild like practices.

Of course I run into the same kind of laws in the Maghreb, copy paste from France.

The whole rotted "social cohesion" and "disloyal competition" framework needs to be bloody junked.

ADDED
The above is one reason why, when the riots were going on and people like Pipes the Bigot, Sullivan the Islamophobe and the like were pissing on about an Intefada in France, I was so entirely maddened by their ignorant whanking.

As "conservative" commentators, there was a real clear lesson, not the faux idiocy about a Muslim uprising (and a good number of the 'immigrants' were not even Muslim nominally), but the evils of a socialist "solidarity" system that punishes initative, operates as a club for the blancs, and generally is empty rhetoric masking deep discrimination.

Posted by: The Lounsbury at January 29, 2006 11:04 PM

I really must tackle this soon, either on my own blog or at AFOE. A couple of points: the "French intifada" meme was nonsense then and even more nonsensical now, but you don't see anyone saying they were wrong. Even clueful types like John Robb and Thomas Barnett have still to get back on the chart having lost their wits in November - Barnett claims France is the most likely state to leave the "core" - really?

Regards the economy, it makes a lot of sense that Bebear would be after this. The divide in France is between big and small business. French big industry is highly successful, it's also the sector that protects jobs extensively though. France has protected jobs in big business, and succeeded in competing there as well - it's the small business sector that sucks.

I would suspect it's not so much hire'n'fire that's the problem but financing and bureaucratic bollocks.

Posted by: Alex at January 30, 2006 05:46 AM

Alex

I really must tackle this soon, either on my own blog or at AFOE. A couple of points: the "French intifada" meme was nonsense then and even more nonsensical now, but you don't see anyone saying they were wrong. Even clueful types like John Robb and Thomas Barnett have still to get back on the chart having lost their wits in November - Barnett claims France is the most likely state to leave the "core" - really?

Absolutely, and that is a major reason why I keep banging away here.

Far too many otherwise clever people in the "anglosaxon" commentariat pimped, as you said, aboslutely clueless bollocks and should come clean. That whole core business is tripe if you ask me, but that's another matter.

In re the economy, I think I agree (I certainly do on the main para), but could you clarify "not so much hire'n'fire that's the problem but financing and bureaucratic bollocks." I believe I agree, but my stupid chemonarcotics are making me more dim than normal.

Posted by: The Lounsbury at January 30, 2006 06:17 AM

European, or more accurately EU-ropean, economic reform is usually framed as being a matter of making it easier to hire and fire, with the accent on the "fire" bit. Less job protection, lower social security contributions for employers and such.

I don't think it's that desperately important in France (or in quite a few other countries) - look at the success of the big-firm sector, who practice the most job protection. The really serious barrier to small-business growth is bureaucracy (those absurd licencing requirements, company formation etc), and even more importantly access to finance. German banks traditionally were good at investing in small-to-medium firms (the Mittelstand), but I think it would be pretty tough to get most French banks (which in my humble are usually living in the 19th century) to fund your small business in the 'burbs.

Posted by: Alex at January 30, 2006 07:40 AM

Then we do very much agree. My reply supra to Mathew Hogan was more or less in the same line although flexibility on hiring and firing is important in my mind as well. But the absurd licensing requirements....

And it is far worse in the Copy Paste Maghreb.

As for French banks, my JV partner used to work for ABN, then got slammed over to BNP, to hear her and her ABN colleagues tell it, moving to BNP was like going backwards 200 years. No doubt partly culture shock, going from Dutch bankers to Paris bankers....

Small business finacing, ick. Bizarre off shore shadiness for the old grands ecoles lads, right away.

Posted by: The Lounsbury at January 30, 2006 07:59 AM

Thanks for another strong piece.
My blog doesn't get any real traffic, but I linked to it anyway. Maybe someone with influence will trip over it. Let's hope so.

Ethnic/racial discrimination is such a global phenomenon I am amazed how little attention it has attracted in the age of the internet. Trans-national communication lines multiply at incredible speed. One would think that the dissemination of fairly easy to grasp global ideas might follow, but so far that does not seem to have been the case.

Xenophobia seems to be a curse that resists modern cyber-communication. It is the political and social equivalent of AIDS.

Posted by: Hootsbuddy at January 30, 2006 10:04 AM

Dear Hootsbuddy

As to the blog, pehraps you need to be unreasonable and obnoxious. That seems to sell.

As to the issue of discrimination, I am not surprised. Burning property, tends to make most people rather unreceptive. Not sure I follow your 'global ideas' train of thought, but generally fear of outsiders is an old, biologically ingrained habit. It isn't going to be wiped out by 'communication.'

Posted by: The Lounsbury at January 31, 2006 08:53 PM

interesting. . .i'll be writing my french coursework on the riots cause/solutions/effectivness soon, some ideas to work with thankyou

Posted by: sam at October 15, 2006 12:21 PM

Comment Subscription

Email Address: