August 14, 2005
But do they really mean it...? Or get it? This time?
From the Washington Post:
"What we expected to achieve was never realistic given the timetable or what unfolded on the ground," said a senior official involved in policy since the 2003 invasion. "We are in a process of absorbing the factors of the situation we're in and shedding the unreality that dominated at the beginning.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Fine story, eh?
Made me go back and look over how I called things in 2003.
Posted by: The Lounsbury at August 15, 2005 12:42 PM
Incidentally, this very same paragraph could apply to the Washington Post editorial section.
Cohen has turned against, Applebaum I'm not sure, Krauthammer must still be a die hard, Beinart I'm not sure, Hiatt too, Ignatius turned against, who else?
Posted by: Baal Shem Ra at August 16, 2005 08:49 AM