2006 Weblog Award Finalists


« Flirting by Bluetooth in UAE | Pimping Equity or Pissing it Away?: Private Equity & US Gov Efforts, some quick notes »


August 14, 2005

But do they really mean it...? Or get it? This time?

From the Washington Post:

"What we expected to achieve was never realistic given the timetable or what unfolded on the ground," said a senior official involved in policy since the 2003 invasion. "We are in a process of absorbing the factors of the situation we're in and shedding the unreality that dominated at the beginning.

Posted by Matthew Hogan at August 14, 2005 11:20 PM
Filed Under: Iraq War , US Foreign Policy

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.aqoul.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/1941


Comments

Fine story, eh?

Made me go back and look over how I called things in 2003.

Posted by: The Lounsbury at August 15, 2005 12:42 PM

Incidentally, this very same paragraph could apply to the Washington Post editorial section.

Cohen has turned against, Applebaum I'm not sure, Krauthammer must still be a die hard, Beinart I'm not sure, Hiatt too, Ignatius turned against, who else?

Posted by: Baal Shem Ra at August 16, 2005 08:49 AM

Comment Subscription

Email Address: