« He who warns is excused? | Long Lines at Lebanese-Syrian Border »
July 09, 2005
The wonders of wasta
What is wasta? In Arabic, it roughly means "connections" or influence, and is arguably the most valuable form of currency in much of the Middle East, far more effective than bribes and certainly more effective than following due process.
It is of course an obviously unequitable and counterproductive phenomenon. At a simple level, it puts incompetent people into jobs they ill deserve and will ill manage. As this article notes:
"Intercessory wasta angers unsuccessful candidates who have outstanding credentials, and creates dependencies among those who are less capable, yet obtain power and position because of their wastas."
Anyone working in the Gulf (and possibly in the Western world) will have witnessed "phantom jobs" - a usually prestigious and highly-paid position that is either unneccessary, or carried out by two people. In the latter case, there will be a national and and a lesser-paid expat in essentially the same role. The national will probably have a higher title. The lesser-paid expat will actually do the job.
This can work fine assuming the company is profitable enough for the double-paypacket, unless the national get the whim meddle in an area he is totally unqualified to handle. We can use "he" here fairly safely, given Arab women tend to enter the job market on merit at least as much as wasta. Wasta is in fact a barrier to many females, just as it is to expats of both genders.
On the serious side, wasta can be a significant hindrance to economic development. "Driving out competence by ignoring merit and performance diminishes the nation's economic competitiveness."
A Bahraini diarist compares the Western mantra of "location, location, location" - emphasising being at the right place at the right time - to a Middle East one of "wasta, wasta, wasta" - a strategy of being around the right person at the right time.
"The system evolved to preserve the social structure of the tribe. It allowed for the leadership to distribute the tribe's wealth as they deemed in their wisdom and experience would preserve peace and harmony. They would grant access to opportunities to those most deserving or to those who would otherwise be left behind, at their discretion. It is also important to keep the tribe from weakening itself, therefore internal competition is avoided."
Increasingly these days, the more powerful and more educated people are, the less they will allow wasta to interfere with good business, though the need to promote sons and family pride remains a powerful impulse. Generally though, the greater impacts of wasta are felt further down the social scale:
"Today's wasta is too often a middle-man, seeking fame and fortune by doing favors."
One Gulf woman, who admits using wasta to get a passport renewed quickly, is highly critical of the system:
"At the end of the day, this is a classic third-world country phenomenon. But civil society through different social evolutions should also strive towards organisation and productivity and ending corruption, nepotism and inefficiency."
Wasta is an ingrained phenomenon that is not going to be quickly or easily removed or even minimised. The quoted article recommends working with the flow, trying to turn wasta back to its origins as a principle of "mediation as a pre-emptive quality control mechanism" that can generate both "effective performance and societal harmony".
"Wasta-based decision and allocation systems are politically effective, and can be economically effective if a quality control mechanism is in place. A quality control system in accordance with traditional values holds the wasta responsible for the performance of the client. The wasta must be a guarantor who assumes responsibility for the client's performance."
Posted by secretdubai at July 9, 2005 03:19 PM
Filed Under: Society & Culture
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.aqoul.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/23
Comments
"Wasta-based decision and allocation systems are politically effective, and can be economically effective if a quality control mechanism is in place. A quality control system in accordance with traditional values holds the wasta responsible for the performance of the client. The wasta must be a guarantor who assumes responsibility for the client's performance."
Does this happen in practice (holding the wasta responsible for the performance of the client) or is it rather a hypothetical way for the system to impose effective quality control?
Would be interesting to hear your take on how such a quality control system might operate (that is, a specific example).
Posted by: eponymous at July 9, 2005 08:13 PM
Ah, the oft-mentioned wasta. Kudos for bringing it up, secretdubai. (by the way, Wasta means source as well) Well, considering the fact that I've been here pretty much all my life, wasta is sewn in the fabric, as it were, of the UAE's social life, economic processes, etc. and there is precious little people like us can do about it. As for the verbose suggestion of somehow "regulating" it, I fail to see the logic and request further clarification of how that can be brought about, in the same manner as the earlier comment. Wasta is limited almost exclusively to nationals, and gets along famously with the "preference" concept as well, which people with limited vocabulary, such as myself, might refer to as racial stereotyping and bias.
Posted by: AEDisillusioned at July 10, 2005 01:30 AM
Wasta, being an issue of connexions, is not exclusive to nationals. Although nationals in the UAE are obviously the key ultimate sources.
Leaving that aside, rather clearly the issue of having connexions to get places is not unique to the region - fully half of my experience has some ties to getting in the door due to knowing people.
The key issue is how much blood ties or quasi familial ties drive decisions over more or less "merit."
Rather clearly if the Gulf and the rest of the region wish to become economically efficient, Wasta needs to be transformed. Nothing will make it go away, ingrained part of human behaviour, but it can and must be transformed
Posted by: The Lounsbury at July 10, 2005 08:12 AM
Reminds me a lot of Mexico. I don't think this is confined to the Middle East as a problem, really. In Mexico it's the large Latin extended family, which probably functions in ways very similar to the way a tribe does in the Middle East. And even getting a passport renewal done in less than, oh, a year, will involve some grease, same as for the Bahraini diarist.
Even in NYC, once you get below the big companies into the mid-sized and small ones, you get a lot of family connection stuff going on, although a person does usually have to have some minimal qualifications for whatever job the person gets.
It's probably more a function of how robust the economy is than anything else: if there's a lot of opportunity, family connections will matter less, if not, they'll take on increasing importance.
Posted by: pantom at July 10, 2005 02:25 PM
The expat/national combinations are all too common. In Saudi oil refineries (at least non-ARAMCO ones, ARAMCO might be different), the "managers" are usually unqualified nationals, and the guy just below him is the hard-working expat.
Posted by: zurn at July 10, 2005 02:30 PM
Oh I've heard some absolutely super stories about nationals at Aramco and the kind of "jobs" they do! Granted there are talented and hard working Saudis employed there, but there are still plenty of old guard on six-figure US salaries, with jobs such as "official poster stamper".
Posted by: secretdubai at July 11, 2005 05:35 AM

RSS





